“If your husband was trapped in a car, would …”

Common English Blunders, Verbs

I saw this during a television commercial.

Problem:
The “If” clause should have been written in the past subjunctive mood.

Explanation:
The TV commercial was on the Discovery Health channel.

“Could You Survive?” is the title of the show that was being advertised.

The premise of the show is to ask viewers whether they would be prepared to survive in the event of a disaster or other emergency.

The complete sentence that I saw was along the lines of “If your husband was trapped in a car, would you be able to rescue him?”

The problem with this sentence is that “was” is the wrong form of the verb “be” to use in the if-clause.

The if-clause is a subordinate clause — also called a “protasis” — in this conditional sentence.

A conditional sentence discusses one of the following:

  • a factual implication, as in “If you cool water to 0 degrees Celsius, it freezes.”;
  • a hypothetical situation, as in “If you were king, would you make me a knight?”

If the hypothetical situation is described with a contrary-to-fact present conditional, then the past subjunctive must be used.

In other words, as noted at Wikipedia, the past subjunctive is used after the conjunction if to express hypotheses.

It is a common English blunder to use simply the past tense, and that is the blunder made by the TV ad writer.

Solution:
“If your husband were trapped in a car, would …”

“He sites the following historic quotes …”

Misspellings, Verbs

I saw this recently on a website.

Problem:
The writer used the wrong verb.

Explanation:
The full sentence was “He sites the following historic quotes regarding Thanksgiving.”

The verb “site” — spelled S-I-T-E — means to place, situate or locate at or on a site.

It is clear that the writer of the sentence was trying to say “refers to” when he wrote “site” with an “s”.

So the writer should have used the verb “cite” — spelled C-I-T-E — which means to quote, especially as an authority.

Solution:
“He cites the following historic quotes …”

OnlyWire

General

I promised on the first anniversary of KirkMahoney.com that I would look at ways to make this website more useful to you.

One way is to make it easier for you to share what I write with friends and family.

The OnlyWire “BOOKMARK & SHARE” button that now appears on all pages uses a technology that supports this.

This complements the “ShareThis” button found on many pages and gives you a choice about which social-networking technology to use — ShareThis or OnlyWire.

The advantage of ShareThis is that you need not have a ShareThis account to submit content to a particular social-networking site such as Digg or Furl.

The advantage of OnlyWire is that you can simultaneously submit content to as many social-networking sites as you have registered with OnlyWire.

As explained at the OnlyWire website, the OnlyWire “BOOKMARK & SHARE” button lets you automatically and simultaneously submit Web content to all of your social bookmarking sites, including:

  • Ask;
  • Backflip;
  • Bibsonomy
  • Blinklist;
  • Blue Dot;
  • BookmarkSync;
  • Connotea;
  • del.icio.us;
  • de.lirio.us;
  • Diigo;
  • Facebook;
  • Furl;
  • Jumptags;
  • linkatopia;
  • Linkroll;
  • ma.gnolia;
  • Multiply;
  • My Web Yahoo!
  • Newsvine;
  • Simpy;
  • Spurl;
  • Technorati;
  • Twitter.

Even more instantaneously, the OnlyWire “BOOKMARK & SHARE” button lets you email notifications about what you are reading to friends and family.

And the OnlyWire “BOOKMARK & SHARE” button lets you save any page you see here as a private bookmark in your Google Bookmarks account while you simultaneously share the page with social-networking sites.

I hope that you find this change helpful. If you have other ideas for how to improve KirkMahoney.com, please let me know through my contact form!